Harrison v. Cleino

— The brief of appellants in this case is so flagrantly violative of the second clause of rule fifteen of this court, regarding the statement of the case, that we feel called upon to dismiss the appeal.

To tolerate a practice of this character, the court would waste much of its valuable time in trying to ascertain the points relied upon for a reversal of the case.

Clearly the meaning of the rule is, that the statement of the points shall be clearly and fully stated, in order that the court may comprehend therefrom the facts upon which the legal propositions presented for determination are…