Landry v. City of Detroit
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partM. J. Kelly, J.
I agree with the majority opinion except as to its treatment of the nuisance issue and the public-building exception to governmental immunity.
Plaintiffs assert that allowing a dangerous condition to continue in the Recorder’s Court, Frank Murphy Hall of Justice constitutes a nuisance. In Furness v Public Service Comm, 100 Mich App 365, 370; 299 NW2d 35 (1980), the Court stated:
"The gravamen of these allegations is that the defendants were negligent in failing to correct a known danger (nuisance). This alleged conduct is omissive rather than commissive and would therefore fall within the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bush v. Oscoda Area SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Rosario v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Pichette v. Manistique Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Furness v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Vargo v. SvitchanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.