Legal Opinion

State v. Northern Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 22, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

•Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Aitkin county, Sleeper, J., presiding, overruling a demurrer to its answer in a proceeding to collect personal property taxes.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

The court below sustained a general demurrer to defendant’s answer, (directing judgment in plaintiff’s favor,) which demurrer was argued in connection with a stipulation as to the facts. The only question to be considered is the taxability of a quantity of pine logs cut upon lands belonging to defendant, — a railway corporation, — which lands are confessedly exempt from taxation by virtue of Sp. Laws 1865, c. 8, § 1, and Sp. Laws 1870, c. 65, § 1, and were acquired by the act of congress of July 2,1864, (13 U. S. St. at Large, 365,) in which every odd-numbered section of land, not mineral,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. County of Ramsey v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. County of Todd v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Marr v. LutherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. County of Hennepin v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. State v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API