Chiara v. Belaustegui
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Mowbray, J.:
The principal issue presented for our consideration in this appeal is whether a 59(e) motion to alter or amend a judgment may be utilized to vacate a default judgment. 1 We rule that it may not be so used.
1. The Facts.
The respondents, who were the plaintiffs below, commenced a quiet-title action in the district court. The Chiaras, who are the appellants, answered the complaint and filed a counterclaim. Thereafter, respondents served interrogatories upon the appellants as provided by Rule 33. 2 The appellants failed to respond to the interrogatories within the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Greene v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1999
- Long v. A-1 24 Hour Towing, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
- Paradise Palms Community Ass'n v. Paradise HomesNevada Supreme Court · 1970