Haub v. Friermuth
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. " John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.
Action for slander.
Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for one thousand dollars damages, and the defendant has appealed.
In his complaint the plaintiff alleges that the defendant spoke of and concerning him in the presence of one Gibson and divers other persons the following defamatory words, viz.: “I have a man to prove that George Haub struck Richard Schwartz in front of his place of business; that he had two witnesses who had tracked the bloodstains from Haub’s shop to the place where Schwartz fell unconscious, and that he had proof that Haub was guilty of the murder of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ransom v. McCurleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Schmisseur v. KreilichIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
- Fox v. VanderbeckNew York Supreme Court · 1826
- Chace v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Irish-American Bank v. BaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Okun v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Albertini v. SchaeferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Fleet v. TichenorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Des Granges v. CrallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Swift & Co. v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.