Legal Opinion

Plowman v. King

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 12, 1916PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Van Burén District Court. — D. M. Anderson, Judge. The opinion sufficiently states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

James F. King and his wife, Sarah E. King, were the parents of one child, a daughter, Lettie F. King. The daughter married one Henry Pauly, and of that marriage, one child, Bruce K. Pauly, was born. Within ten days after the birth of this child, its mother died, and her body was brought to the home of her parents at Milton, loAa, for burial. The babe was at the same time brought to the home of its grandparents, and thenceforward remained in that home until its death, 12 years later. The circumstances under which the grandparents received and thereafter kept the child are the subject of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trainer v. TrumbullMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  2. Stansbury v. Stansbury's Adm'rsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Dale v. Colfax Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Skeels v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Saunders v. SaundersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Reynolds v. HenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Lorimer v. Hutchinson Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Wilson v. ElseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. BaneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API