State v. Rudd
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Worth District Court. — -Hon. John 0. Sherwin, Judge. The defendant was convicted on an indictment charging him with assault on Josephine Style, a female, with intent to commit a rape, on the fifteenth day of March, 1894. His motion for a new trial was overruled, and judgment entered against him, from which he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGiven, J.
1 I. Appellant’s first contention is that there is no proper judgment against him, for that “there is no finding by the court of guilty.” The record shows a trial, verdict of “guilty of assault with intent to commit a rape upon Josephine Style, as charged”; that defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict, and for a new trial, was heard and overruled, and that afterwards, on the same day, the cause came on for judgment; that the defendant, being present, was informed by the court of the nature *391of the indictment, his plea, and the verdict of the jury thereon, “and, no legal cause being shown…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. FarmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- State v. HarperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Borough v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- State v. OwensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.