Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mumford v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1995No. 49A02-9412-CR-755Published

1DissentSullivan, Judge

The purpose of I1.C. 35-88-2-3(c) is to permit a trial court to revoke probation for a violation which takes place during the period of probation but for which disposition is not or cannot be made within the probation peri*1180od. Perry v. State (1994) 3d Dist.Ind.App., 642 N.E.2d 536; Slinkard v. State (1993) 1st Dist.Ind.App., 625 N.E.2d 1282; Phillips v. State (1993) 3d Dist.Ind.App., 611 N.E.2d 198. Were it not for this "tolling" statute, an egregious violation taking place upon the final day of one's probation could not result in revocation because timely and effective notice and hearing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Slinkard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Perry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Phillips v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API