Legal Opinion

In the Interest of A.E.O.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 22, 1989No. 88-1343PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

This appeal arises from child in need of assistance (CINA) proceedings in which the court ordered an adolescent’s continued placement in a substance abuse treatment facility. On appeal from that order, the juvenile appellant poses the following question: Should the remedy for failure to conduct the initial review hearing within six months from the date of the dispositional hearing in a CINA proceeding be dismissal of the proceedings? Because we do not believe the legislature intended the harsh consequences suggested by appellant’s query, we affirm the district court.

The facts…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  2. State v. LohrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Pearson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. In Interest of A.R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  5. In the Interest of L.P.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. In Re Interest of Brandy M.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. Iowa District Court for Black Hawk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  4. Montgomery Ward Development Corp. ex rel. Ad Valorem Tax, Inc. v. Cedar Rapids Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. State v. BlakleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API