Legal Opinion
Dahman v. Embassy Of Qatar
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 25, 2019No. Civil Action No. 17-2628 (JEB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
Plaintiff El-Sayed Dahman brought this age-discrimination suit against both his former employer, the Embassy of Qatar, and the State of Qatar, alleging that they violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act in terminating him from his position as an accountant. Defendants never appeared, and Dahman successfully moved for a default judgment on liability. Finally arriving on the scene, Defendants now move on several grounds both to vacate the default and to dismiss the case. Agreeing that the suit…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Farhad Azima v. Rak Investment AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Youssef v. United Arab Emirates EmbassyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021