Legal Opinion

Opinion No. 68-297 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided February 13, 1969Published

1Opinion of the Court

District Judges — Marriage Ceremony — Fee A District Judge or other salaried Judicial Officer can not receive any remuneration, gratuity, gift or fee or money under any other denomination for the performance of the solemnization of a marriage ceremony. The Attorney General has had under consideration your recent letter wherein you in effect ask the following question: Can a District Judge or other salaried Judicial Officer lawfully or properly receive any remuneration, gratuity, gift or fee or money under any other denomination for the performance of the solemnization of a marriage ceremony?…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. v. Hooker, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Coggeshall v. ConnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Appeal of Rhea v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Baker v. Board of County Com'rs of Okmulgee CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API