Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Farr

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 19, 1993No. 14728PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a disagreement about the geographic eligibility of a player for an American Legion baseball team is rendered moot by the player’s subsequent ineligibility on the ground of age. The plaintiffs, Andrew Dawson and the Simsbury American Legion Post No. 84 baseball team, brought an action to enjoin the defendants, David Farr, The American Legion and The American Legion Department of Connecticut, Inc., from interfering with the named plaintiff’s playing for the plaintiff team during the 1992 summer season. After a hearing, the trial court, O’Neill,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Serrani v. Board of EthicsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Raymark Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Moshier v. GoodnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Connecticut State Medical Society v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Hallas v. Town of WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Houlahan v. Greenwich Plan. Zone Com., No. Cv 98 0165281 S (Jun. 21, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
  2. P.R.I.C.E., Inc. v. Keeney, No. Cv94 542469 (Mar. 20, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
  3. State Farm Fire Casualty Co. v. Bullock, No. 387111 (Dec. 27, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API