Legal Opinion

F. Hartkemeyer & Co. v. Griffith

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 2, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Polk District ■ Court.. — Hon. Jesse A. Miller, Appellant. This is an action at law on account for goods sold and delivered. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, C. J.

'The petition describes the plaintiff as a- copartnership doing business at Cincinnati, Ohio. It sets forth a cause of action in its favor against the defendant for goods sold and delivered to the amount of $513.83 to the defendant. The defendant answered by a general ■denial. The cause came on for trial on May 26, 1908, before the court without a jury. 'At the trial the plaintiff read in evidence the deposition of Frank Hartkemeyer. On direct examination, this witness testified as follows.: “Q. What relation, if any, do you bear to the plaintiff in this action, Frank Hartkemeyer & Co. % A. I…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thune Ex Rel. Thune v. Hokah Cheese Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. Keeling v. PriebeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  3. Carlisle v. Sells-Floto Shows Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. D. A. Enslow & Son v. EnnisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. In re DennenySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API