Ramey v. Ramey
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentLittlejohn, Justice
(dissenting) :
I respectfully dissent and would reverse the order of the lower court.
Our guest statute was enacted by the legislature in 1930. It is an exact copy of one enacted by the legislature of Connecticut in 1927. See Fulghum v. Bleakley, 177 S. C. 286, 181 S. E. 30 (1935). In Silver v. Silver, 280 U. S. 117, 50 S. Ct. 57, 74 L. Ed. 221 (1929), the United States Supreme Court held the Connecticut statute constitutional. In Cannon v. Oviatt, 419 U. S. 810, 95 S. Ct. 24, 42 L. Ed. (2d) 37 (1974), the same Court summarily affirmed the Utah Supreme Count’s decision upholding its guest…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.