Legal Opinion
Klein v. Twentieth Century-Fox International Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 20, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDi Falco, J.
On the trial of this action motions were made to dismiss the complaint at the close of the case and to set aside the verdict of the jury, and decision was reserved. The action is to recover commissions for services rendered by the plaintiffs on behalf of Twentieth Century-Fox International Corporation, one of the defendants. The testimony at the trial disclosed that the plaintiff and a representative of Belfire, S. A., a foreign corporation, went to Fox’s New York office in order to obtain a 16-mm. movie distribution contract for Belfire. No action was taken by Fox at this time and plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hyatt v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Elco Shoe Manufacturers, Inc. v. SiskNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Dickinson v. . TysenNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Roome v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Greenfield v. BauschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scientific Holding Company, Ltd. v. Plessey IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Reiser, Inc. v. Roberts Real EstateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate v. BernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Hasbrouck v. RymkevitchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966