Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 4, 2013No. 13-6048UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

TIMOTHY M. TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.

James Alexander Drummond, attorney for the now-deceased plaintiff Michael Edward Hooper, appeals from a decision of the district court refusing to compensate him under the Criminal Justice Act (CJA), 18 U.S.C. § 3599, for work performed in connection with an unsuccessful challenge to Hooper’s execution by lethal injection. For the reasons explained below, we exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and reverse.

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Mr. Drummond was appointed under § 3599(a)(2) to represent Mr. Hooper in habeas proceedings…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Hill v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Harbison v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Palma-Salazar v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  5. Clark v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Christopher Wilkins v. Lorie Davis, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API