Legal Opinion
Wirtz v. Mercantile Stores Co.
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 17, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 6221PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Upon consideration of the Motion ■ to Quash Process and to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, filed herein by the Defendant, Mercantile Stores Company, Incorporated, Mercantile, and the Motion of the Plaintiff to Overrule the same, the Court finds that the Motion to Quash Process against the said defendant should be sustained and the Motion to Dismiss stricken without prejudice to being hereafter reasserted in this case.
To sustain the Motion to Quash Defendant Mercantile urges that it is a foreign corporation as it was organized and is existing under the laws of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- First Flight Company v. National Carloading CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962
- Austad v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1956
- Zwingle v. Tyson's Foods, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1965
- Dominguez v. National Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gottlieb v. Sandia American Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Idaho Potato Commission v. Washington Potato CommissionDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1976
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,971Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971