Legal Opinion

Musser v. Schock

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1928No. Appeal 186PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Defendant appeals from judgment for the amount claimed in an infant’s suit to recover the value of an automobile delivered by the infant to defendant as part of the purchase price of another car sold to the plaintiff by defendant.

The price of the new car was $1,584; defendant’s pleadings aver that plaintiff’s old one was taken on account “at the agreed price of” $1,100; his note was taken for the balance. While in plaintiff’s possession, the new car was damaged; he took it to defendant for repair; when he demanded it back, defendant refused to return it unless he paid his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frank Spangler Co. v. HauptSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. Kay v. HauptSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Friedman v. HuberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Pentimall v. Bankers Automobile Finance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pankas v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Yubas v. WitaskisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Dobson v. Rosini, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API