Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Almanza v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 26, 2016No. 13-130CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keywords: Fair Labor Standards Act; 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219; Time spent in training; 5 C.F.R. § 651.423; Summary Judgment; RCFC 56(a).

OPINION AND ORDER

ELAINE D. KAPLAN, Judge

Plaintiffs in this case are 290 Customs and Border Protection Officers (CBPOs) and Border Patrol Agents (BPAs or “agents”) who are now or were formerly employed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security (CBP). Pis.’ Mot. Summ. J. (Pis.’ Mot.) at 1, EOF No. 79. They filed this action to recover overtime pay for time that they spent studying outside of regular working hours while attending CBP’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Jan's Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. 1 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  2. Almanza v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Almanza v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  4. Almanza v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Almanza v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API