Legal Opinion

Philadelphia v. Brady

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1932No. Appeals, 178, 179 and 180PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

Scire facias proceedings were instituted to enforce municipal liens for a sewer construction under the authority of the City of Philadelphia. The defendant, Charles P. Brady, who was the owner of the tract of land through which the sewer system extended, filed his affidavit of defense setting forth that his property was not liable for sewer assessments measured by the foot-front rule, because, as he alleged, it was not urban but rural property. The tract of land was located in the 35th Ward of the City of Philadelphia and consisted of 64 acres.

The issues on three…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Girard Trust Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. City of McKeesport v. SolesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Hanover Water Co. v. Ashland Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  4. Craig v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  5. Selig v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Honey Springs Homeowners Ass'n v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Honey Springs Homeowners Ass'n v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Servedia v. Lawrence County, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API