Legal Opinion

Morris v. Naugle

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 24, 1989No. Civ. PN-89-2549PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NIEMEYER, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s personal injury suit, which was filed originally in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Maryland, was removed to this Court by defendants by reason of diversity of citizenship and the jurisdictional .amount. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 1332. The complaint, which alleges “serious, permanent, painful injuries to [plaintiff’s] head, legs, neck, back and chest,” pain and mental anguish, and loss of income and medical expenses, demands $200,000 in damages.

After removal, the plaintiff filed a motion to remand in which she argues that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gardner v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Whiteford System, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
  3. South River Capital, LLC v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API