Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1951No. Appeal, 102PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

This is an action in assumpsit by the beneficiary in seven life insurance policies issued by defendant. Plaintiff was the widow of the insured, Tom Harrison, to whom the policies were issued upon his written applications, copies of which were attached to the policies and made part thereof. The policies aggregated $43,000, and each policy contained a clause which provided: “If the age of the insured has been misstated, the amount payable hereunder shall be such as the premium paid would have purchased at the correct age.” The insured’s applications stated that he was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Simpson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. District of Columbia's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Lappe v. GfellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Hervitz v. New York Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schultz v. PivarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Brown v. Ambridge Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. United States v. KlissasDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
  4. C-C-YBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1961
  5. Singer v. Metropolitan Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API