Legal Opinion

Horn v. Los Angeles Nut House

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1936No. Civ. 10181PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DESMOND, J., pro tem.

Appeal from a judgment awarding damages in contract to plaintiff. Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that on or about July 1, 1932, he entered into a contract with defendants whereby he was to install at their place of business a department with the necessary machinery for processing nuts and manufacturing peanut butter, and “in addition would purchase pecans in large quantities on the joint account of both plaintiff and defendants, with a view to selling the same at a profit”; further, that in so far as the purchase of pecans was concerned, he was to expend from his own…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berger v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. KnightenOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Willis v. CrawfordOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Balfour v. San Joaquin Valley BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1906
  5. Meyer v. Henry Cowell Lime & Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. St. James Church of Christ Holiness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. People v. WitzermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Dills v. Delira Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API