Lynch v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Presiding Judge
Introduction
Richard Lynch (Movant) appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues the motion court erred in denying post-conviction relief because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the presence of the victims in the courtroom and for failing to submit an instruction for a lesser-included offense. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
A jury convicted Movant after a trial of burglary in the first degree, two counts of robbery in the first degree, and three…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Tisius v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hudson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. KEVIN LEE HAUSMANNMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023