Legal Opinion

Soloman v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.

*1181“As a general rule, participants in a sporting event or activity may be held to have consented to those injury-causing events which are known, apparent or reasonably foreseeable” (Rubenstein v Woodstock Riding Club, 208 AD2d 1160, 1160 [1994] [citation omitted]). “[A]n inherent risk in sporting events involving horses is injury due to the sudden and unintended actions of the animals, . . . [including] being thrown or falling” (Tilson v Russo, 30 AD3d 856, 857 [2006] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). “The experience of the participant certainly is relevant in deciding whether…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rubenstein v. Woodstock Riding Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Tilson v. RussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Dalton v. Adirondack Saddle Tours, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fenty v. Seven Meadows Farms, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Filer v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Fenty v. Seven Meadows Farms, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Filer v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API