Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cordoba

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 7, 2006PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals from the order granting Samuel Cordoba’s (Appellee) motion for Habeas Corpus relief and dismissing the sole charge against him for recklessly endangering another person. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

¶ 2 The Court of Common Pleas summarized the facts of this case as follows:

The alleged victim, an adult male, had a consensual sexual relationship with the defendant for about two weeks during the month of June 2003. The defendant and the alleged victim engaged in oral sex approximately five to six times. NT at 18-19. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Commonwealth v. HopkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. SantosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Liciaga v. Court of Common PleasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. KleinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. VogelsongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. State v. MeansSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  3. Stepanovich v. McGrawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Com. v. Cravener, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Com. v. Brown, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API