Legal Opinion

Shickle, Harrison & Howard Iron Co. v. Council Bluffs City Water-Works Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 12, 1891Published

Appeal from Pottaivattamie District Cowrt. — Hon. N. W. Macy, Judge. Action to recover on a contract of guaranty. There was a judgment for the plaintiff from which the defendant company appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

The plaintiff company is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Missouri, the defendant company is a corporation organized under the laws of this state, and the American Construction Company is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New York. These corporatipns are, for the sake of brevity, designated in the record as the “iron company,” the “water-works company” and the “construction company,” and these designations will, for the same reason, be followed in the opinion. The business of the iron company is the manufacture and sale of iron pipes, castings, etc.;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dobbin v. BradleyNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Union Bank v. . Coster's ExecutorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Tootle v. ElgutterNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Weiler v. HenarieOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Wadsworth & Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API