Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Richardson
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided September 3, 1959No. Record 4969PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.
We granted Dr. George J. Carroll a writ of error to a judgment entered against him by the Circuit Court of the City of Suffolk on the 11th day of June, 1958, in a motion for judgment wherein Roy Robertson Richardson, an infant seventeen years of age, sued by his father and next friend.
The motion for judgment alleged that Dr. Carroll, a medical doctor, by and through his servant and employee, had been negligent in performing a routine blood test on young Richardson, immediately after which Richardson fainted and fell to the floor, causing the injuries complained of.
The action was first brought…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
- Hunter v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Interstate Veneer Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
- Fox v. MasonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
- Alexander v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Weldon A. Price v. Susanne Neyland, as Next Friend of Michele Marie Neyland, an Infant, and Herbert NeylandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Estate of Taylor v. Flair Property AssociatesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
- Spiegelman v. BirchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
- McKenzie v. FrancisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973