Legal Opinion

United States v. 2600 State Drugs, Inc., Edward Kravetz, Melburn Holtzman and Raymond Holtzman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 8, 1956No. 11654_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAIM, Circuit Judge.

The defendant, 2600 State Drugs, Inc., and the individual defendants, Edward Kravetz, Melburn Holtzman and Raymond Holtzman, all of whom were either officers or employees of the defendant drug corporation, were charged in a criminal information with having sold, without a prescription, certain drugs in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. In a trial before the District Court all of the defendants were found guilty of violating the Act.

The principal question presented by this appeal is whether or not those sections of the Federal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. McDermott v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dr. Samuel J. De Freese and Marsha Jean Simmons Defreese v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Dennis C. Deyo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. United States v. Article of DrugCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  4. William L. Palmer, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  5. United States v. General Nutrition, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API