Legal Opinion

Berry v. Cordell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1969No. 44847, 44848, 44849PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Presiding Judge.

The trial court did not err in denying Berry’s motion for summary judgment on the cross claim against its co-defendant, the City of Dalton, in the original tort action. The grounds for this motion are essentially that the back-hoe operator was, at the time of the alleged act of negligence, an employee of the city under both the borrowed servant and inherently dangerous work doctrines (Code § 105-502), thus relieving Berry from any vicarious liability. On the borrowed servant issue there was conflicting evidence on the extent, if any, of the direction and control…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Darnell v. TateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  2. Fulghum Industries, Inc. v. Pollard Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Harvey v. CW MATTHEWS CONTRACTING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Associated Petroleum Carriers, Inc. v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walton v. DatryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Citizens Exchange Bank of Pearson v. KirklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  3. Citizens Exchange Bank of Pearson v. KirklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  4. David Allen Co. v. BentonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  5. David Allen Co. v. BentonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API