Legal Opinion

Smith v. McDonald

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1905No. Docket No. 48PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Hillsdale; Lockwood, J., presiding. Assumpsit by George N. Smith against John P. McDonald and Mary McDonald on a promissory note. There was judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings-error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

Plaintiff and the first-named defendant were the principal parties in the preceding case. McDonald v. Smith, ante, 211. The controversy in this suit arises out of the alleged scheme of fraud described in that case. In the final alleged fraudulent transaction defendant incurred an obligation of $550. To secure its payment he gave on' May 14, 1900, two notes, one of $300 and one of $250. October 6, 1900, he,took up these notes, *227received credit of $90, and gave one note of $460, executed by himself and his mother, his codefendant, Mary McDonald. This note was subsequently transferred to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Briesenmeister v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Craig v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Dailey v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. CramptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Cresinger v. ReedMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Smith v. WerkheiserMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hakes v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. In RE PEOPLE v. JoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. John Schweyer & Co. v. MellonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Yanelli v. LittlejohnMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API