McKay v. Carrington
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
[This was a bill in equity by Jesse McKay against Elizabeth J. Carrington.]
1Opinion of the Court
OBINION OF
THE COURT.
This controversy arises on a contract dated the 13th December, 1S1?, by which the defendant, a resident of Virginia, sold to the complainant 23G7 acres of land in two tracts, in Ohio, which the defendant had purchased under a decree of this court against Samuel G. Mar-, tin. Martin had purchased the land of Edward Carrington, deceased, in his life time, the husband of the defendant; but had paid only a small part of the consideration money. To compel the payment of the balance a suit in chancery was brought by the defendant, as administratrix of her husband’s estate, and…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Merchants' Bank v. . ThomsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Fowler v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
- King v. RuckmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1869
- Whitaker v. . BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. CordsiemonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.