Legal Opinion

Catalano v. Catalano

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 3, 1987No. 87-543PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COWART, Judge.

This appeal is dismissed as untimely. Motions for rehearing (or for “reconsideration”) of an order issued under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) are not authorized. Therefore, such motion in this case did not toll the time for appellant to file a notice of appeal from the order dis*78missing appellant’s petition under that Rule. See Ramos v. State, 456 So.2d 1297 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Smith v. Weede, 433 So.2d 992 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Tacy v. Davis, 425 So.2d 603 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). See also Francisco v. Victoria Marine Shipping, Inc., 486 So.2d 1386 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Francisco v. Victoria Marine ShippingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Smith v. WeedeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Ramos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Tacy v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Irwin v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Albano v. AlbanoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Drak, L.L.C. v. Salcines Development, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. Thornton v. JabeenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Redmond v. First Guaranty Mortg. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  5. Redmond v. First Guaranty Mortg. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API