Legal Opinion

Otis Neil Turner, Jr., Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. City of Reno, Defendant/appellant/cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 21, 1992No. 91-16063Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

976 F.2d 738

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Otis Neil TURNER, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

v.

CITY OF RENO, Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 91-16063, 91-16120.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Sept. 17, 1992.

Decided Sept. 21, 1992.

Before SCHROEDER, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM*

OVERVIEW

2

Otis…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. K Mart Corp. v. PonsockNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Gildersleeve v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  5. Roberts v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API