Legal Opinion

Brasher v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1926No. 7 Div. 146PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

The controlling principles of law governing this case necessitates a reversal of the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken.

In this case the court instructed the jury orally as follows:

“The court charges the jury that, if you believe the evidence in this case beyond a reasonable doubt, you will find the defendant guilty as charged under count 2 of the indictment. The form of your verdict will be, ‘We, the jury, find the defendant guilty as charged under count 2 of the indictment,’ one of you signing it as foreman.”

No such written charge is shown by the record, and to thus…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pate v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Edmunds v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Bertrand v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  3. Thrash v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API