Legal Opinion
Brasher v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided April 20, 1926No. 7 Div. 146PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.
The controlling principles of law governing this case necessitates a reversal of the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken.
In this case the court instructed the jury orally as follows:
“The court charges the jury that, if you believe the evidence in this case beyond a reasonable doubt, you will find the defendant guilty as charged under count 2 of the indictment. The form of your verdict will be, ‘We, the jury, find the defendant guilty as charged under count 2 of the indictment,’ one of you signing it as foreman.”
No such written charge is shown by the record, and to thus…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pate v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Edmunds v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Bertrand v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971
- Thrash v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930