Legal Opinion

Broderick v. Weinsier

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

This is a motion for summary judgment in an action brought by the Superintendent of Banks to recover the sum of $4,500 assessed against the defendant as the holder of forty-five shares of stock of Globe Bank and Trust Company of the par value of $100 each.

The answer contains various defenses, most of which may be briefly disposed of. The first defense alleges that at the time the Superintendent of Banks took possession of the property and business of Globe Bank and Trust Company it had sufficient assets to pay its creditors in full and that it has enough assets at the present time, “ if…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Whitman v. Oxford National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Willis v. MabonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stafford v. Fox-Great Falls Theatre Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. GazulisCity of New York Municipal Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API