Palmigiano v. Howard
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
Respondent directed to file answer to petition for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, articulated by Supreme Court as a petition for the great writ, and therein to show cause, if any he has, why the writ should not issue as prayed, said answer to be limited to the following questions:
Nichalos A. Palmigiano, petitioner, pro se. Richard J. Israel, Attorney General, Donald P. Ryan, Asst. Attorney General, for respondent.(1) whether G. L. 1956, §11-7-4, charges a felony or a mis' demeanor, as raised by paragraph 1 of the petition;(2) whether the imposition of a sentence to be served at the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Guentter v. Borough of LansdaleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Wattman v. WattmanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972