Furry v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
SNELL, Justice.
This appeal by the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) arises out of an adverse ruling in a judicial review action. The question here is whether, under Iowa Code section 321J.9 (1989), actual operation of a motor vehicle is a prerequisite to license revocation for chemical test refusal. We conclude that it is and therefore affirm the district court’s ruling reversing the DOT’s license revocation decision.
The facts are essentially uncontested. On or about June 23, 1989, two Dubuque police officers stopped a vehicle whose oc*870cupants fled on foot. One of the occupants,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jackson County Public Hospital v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Casteel v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Hearst Corp. v. Iowa Department of Revenue & FinanceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Mary v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Veach v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Soo Line Railroad v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Furthmyer v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Gaskey v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- King v. City of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Furthmyer v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.