Legal Opinion
Vorhis-Deaton v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 22, 2014No. Case No. 3:13-cv-266PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER THAT: (1) THE ALJ’S NON-DISABILITY FINDING IS NOT SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, AND IS REVERSED; (2) JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AWARDING BENEFITS; AND (3) THIS CASE IS CLOSED
TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.
This is a Social Security disability benefits appeal. At issue is whether the administrative law judge (the “ALJ”) erred in finding Plaintiff “not disabled” from August 25, 2005 through January 23, 2012, and therefore not entitled to supplemental security income (“SSI”). (See Administrative Transcript at (“Tr.”) (Tr. 207-424) (ALJ’s decision)).
I
Plaintiff filed an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Blakley v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Eddie W. ABBOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis M. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Labaron C. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Phetteplace v. Social Security, Commissioner ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Tina P. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026