Legal Opinion

Boomsma v. Star Transport, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 14, 2002No. 99-C-895, 99-C-896PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

RANDA, District Judge.

These actions come before the Court on a Rule 60(b) motion by the plaintiffs for relief from the Court’s Orders of June 26, 2001 and March 7, 2002 as they relate to “choice of law.” Specifically, the plaintiffs assert that Illinois law applies to their wrongful death damages claims against defendants Star Transport, Inc. (“Star”) and Charles I. Bennett (“Bennett”). In the event the Court decides that Wisconsin law applies, the plaintiffs ask the Court to certify an interlocutory appeal of the choice-of-law issue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Also…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. United States v. Hollywood Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. James v. Talano, M.D. v. Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Strenke v. HognerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Intercon Solutions, Inc. v. Basel Action NetworkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  3. Bailey v. Skipperliner Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2003
  4. Stupak v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003
  5. Wischer v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API