Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ralios v. Iannotta (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 2016No. 2015-1177PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Relator-appellant, Mateo Ralios, is an inmate who filed a complaint for a writ prohibiting respondent-appellee Lisa J. Iannotta, Chief of the Collections Enforcement Section of the Ohio Attorney General’s Office, from enforcing a demand for Ralios to reimburse the state for money paid out by the Crime Victims Reparations Fund.

{¶ 2} The court of appeals dismissed Ralios’s complaint because he failed to comply with the filing requirements in R.C. 2969.25(C). Ralios also failed to object to the magistrate’s opinion below and asserts an argument here that he did not assert below and that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portage County Board of Commissioners v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. White v. BechtelOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Boles v. KnabOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State ex rel. McGrath v. McDonnellOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State ex rel. Wilson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Figueroa v. Ohio Dept. of Commerce, Div. of Real Estate & Professional Licensing (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. White v. Grange Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Barclay Square Condo. Owners Assn. v. RubleOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API