Legal Opinion

Marvin Martinez Alquijay v. Merrick Garland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 27, 2022No. 20-70470PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARVIN MARTINEZ ALQUIJAY, No. 20-70470 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A088-709-286 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted May 11, 2022* Pasadena, California Filed July 27, 2022 Before: Sandra S. Ikuta, Jacqueline H. Nguyen, and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Ikuta * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2 MARTINEZ ALQUIJAY V. GARLAND…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Barlow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  4. Pasqual Antonio-Martinez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Johan Sumolang v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lopez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  2. Magana-Magana v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. James v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
  4. Roger Real v. Attorney General United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API