Burdick v. Security Life Ass'n
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the Livingston Circuit Court. — Hon. F. J. Broaddus, Judge. (1) The record does not show that the bill of exceptions was ever filed, or filed in time, and the judgment should be affirmed. (2) There is no record in this cause in this court, .and the judgment should be affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P. J.
This case was here on defendant’s appeal at the October term, 1898, when the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded. 77 Mo. App. 629. There has been a re-trial of the cause since then, resulting again in judgment for plaintiff, to reverse which the defendant again has appealed. The action was on a life insurance policy and the error assigned by the defendant for a reversal of the judgment is the action of the trial court in refusing an instruction declaring it, defendant, to be an assessment insurance company doing- business upon the plans provided in article 8, chapter 89, Revised…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lawson v. MillsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Walser v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Butler County v. GraddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Burdick v. Security Life Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hughes v. HendersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Burdick v. Security Life Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Mulloy v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908