Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Sheriff

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1972No. 6840PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant, charged with four counts of murder (NRS 200.010), with robbery (NRS 200.380), and with second-degree arson (NRS 205.015), contends the trial court erred in failing to grant habeas, because (1) there was insufficient evidence adduced at the preliminary hearing to establish probable cause and (2) the magistrate failed to conduct a closed hearing. We reject both contentions.

1. We believe the district court correctly determined, contrary to appellant’s contentions, that there was “probable cause to believe that . . . offense[s] [murder, robbery and second-degree arson] ha[d]…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Azbill v. FisherNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Whittley v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1971

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ricci v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API