O'Leary v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
Appellant was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. Pie contends on appeal that said conviction should be set áside because the evidence, being circumstantial, fails to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis than that of guilt and that such evidence is not inconsistent with every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.. The trial court was asked to direct the trial jury to return a verdict in favor of defendant at the conclusion of the presentation of the Government’s evidence. The motion was denied. No evidence was offered on behalf of defendant.
We have considered the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Abrams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Morton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Canella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Yoffe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kowalchuk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- Robert Johnson and Dona Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- United States ex rel. Thompson v. DyeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
- United States v. O'BRIENDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1965
- Yoho v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953