Legal Opinion
Vermont Supreme Court Administrative Directive No. 17 v. Vermont Supreme Court
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 31, 1990No. 90-102 and 90-122PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Barney, C.J. (Ret.),
Specially Assigned. Petitioners brought a petition for extraordinary relief under V.R.A.P. 21 seeking a declaration that an administrative directive of this Court ordering the delay of most civil jury trials until after July 1,1990 for budgetary reasons is unconstitutional. Petitioners were also plaintiffs in a superior court suit seeking substantially the same relief and have appealed the dismissal of that action. We dismiss the petition for extraordinary relief and affirm the dismissal of the superior court action.
On January 11,1990 this Court issued Administrative…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Lincoln v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
- Edward Davis v. United Fruit Company, Defendant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Steuart v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bloomer v. GibsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Pcolar v. Casella Waste Systems and SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- In Re Appeal of Application for Search WarrantSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- State v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- State v. BatchelderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.