State of Minnesota v. Ian Christopher Mitchell

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

Appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion by denying his mistrial motion and seeks a new trial on charges of first-degree burglary. He also makes pro se arguments, including that the district court erred by entering convictions and imposing sentences on multiple counts of burglary arising from a single course of conduct. We affirm in part and remand.

FACTS

Appellant Ian Christopher Mitchell began a dating relationship with K.K in October 2003, which K.K. ended on November 29 in part because of conflicts about sex. 1 Around 2 a.m. on November 30,…