Birnam Wood Condominium Association v. Pekin Insurance Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Birnam Wood Condominium Association, Case No. 2:24-cv-3920 Plaintiff, Judge Michael H. Watson V. Magistrate Judge Shimeall Pekin Insurance Company, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Pekin Insurance Company (“Defendant”) moves in limine to preclude the testimony of Birnam Wood Condominium’s (“Plaintiff’) expert witnesses. Mot., ECF No. 34." For the reasons below, Defendant’s motion is DENIED. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW A motion in limine is “made before or during trial, to exclude anticipated prejudicial evidence before the evidence…