Stuart v. Village of Lynbrook
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.
The respondent in its answer pleads, and in its memoranda contends, that the petition must be dismissed because, first, the claim was not presented within sixty days after the change of grade was completed; second, this proceeding was not commenced within one year after the change of grade was completed; third, petitioner alone has not the legal capacity to maintain this *168proceeding, since Ms wife, who is a co-owner of the property as tenant by the entirety, is not a party to the proceedmg; and fourth, the petition and proof of claim are insufficient, in that it is not alleged that the change…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dean v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- In Re Whitmore v. . Vil. of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Comesky v. . Village of SuffernNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Stenson v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Goodrich v. Village of OtegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- Opladen v. Town of IslipNew York Supreme Court · 1939