Legal Opinion

Manufacturers' Supplies Co. v. Moyer

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County

Decided June 28, 1921No. 209Published

Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence. C. P. Northumberland Co., Feb. T., 1921, No. 209.

1Opinion of the Court

Moser, J.,

In the opinion filed by Judge Stewart in the case of Krajnetz v. Milwaukee Mechanics’ Ins. Co., tried in Northampton County and reported in 27 Dist. R. 362, it is said: “The plaintiff filed a statement, setting forth that she owned a certain frame dwelling-house which was insured by the defendant company against loss by fire to an amount exceed*66ing $2000; that on Feb. 10, 1917, a fire occurred, resulting in a total loss; that she gave defendant notice of the loss, and in all respects complied with the terms of the policy; that she demanded payment of the said $2000, and the defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ruth-Hastings Glass Tube Co. v. SlatterySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Moore v. Susquehanna Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. King v. Security Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Berko v. Kemper Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API